C'è un modo per superare questo?JiBX unmarshalling - è possibile dire a JiBX di ignorare l'ordine degli elementi?
Ad esempio, il mio XML:
<group>
<idExt>new group idext</idExt>
<user-id>1</user-id>
<parent-id>2</parent-id>
</group>
quando unmarshalling, va senza errori, ma quando cambio ordine:
<group>
<user-id>1</user-id>
<parent-id>2</parent-id>
<idExt>new group idext</idExt>
</group>
fallisce org.jibx.runtime.JiBXException: Expected "group" end tag, found "idExt" start tag (line 4, col 2)
.
mio deserializzazione (attuazione dell'interfaccia Struts2 ContentTypeHandler):
public void toObject(Reader in, Object target) {
try {
IBindingFactory bf = BindingDirectory.getFactory(target.getClass());
IUnmarshallingContext umc = bf.createUnmarshallingContext();
umc.setDocument(in);
// This un-conditional cast is the current way that JibX unmarshalls to an // already instantiated object - YUCK
((IUnmarshallable)target).unmarshal(umc);
} catch (JiBXException e) {
throw new RuntimeException(e);
}
}
E vincolante:
<binding>
<mapping name="group" class="GroupVO" >
<value name="id" field="id" usage="optional"/>
<value name="idExt" field="idExt" usage="optional"/>
<value name="active" field="active" usage="optional"/>
<value name="created-at" field="dateCre" usage="optional"/>
<value name="updated-at" field="dateChg" usage="optional"/>
<value name="deleted-at" field="dateDel" usage="optional"/>
<value name="user-id" field="userId" usage="optional" />
<value name="parent-id" field="parentId" usage="optional" />
</mapping>
</binding>
Quindi, è possibile per JiBX di ignorare l'ordine dei contrassegni?
Semplice. Efficace. Se solo dovessi leggerlo bene ... – Trick